In literary and academic circles, it is not uncommon to encounter the claim that one can never be certain about the proper interpretation of a written text. According to their thinking, since no understanding of a written text can be held with certainty, all interpretation should be held at a provisional level (temporary and likely to be changed later).
Human Behavior Proves that We Know Better
However, if all interpretation is truly only temporary and likely to be changed later, it would hardly be worth the effort to state or defend such a reality. If what I mean by using terms such as interpretation, knowledge, and provisional are unreliable to carry meaning when competently and consistently used, it would be an entirely insane endeavor to attempt to communicate their unreliability with words.
One might concede that language is capable of reliably conveying meaning, but still insist all knowledge is provisional as people are incapable of reliably understanding or interpreting what is communicated to them. That lands us in the same spot: if people are truly incapable of reliably interpreting and understanding meaning, there is no use in talking about it. By communicating, one acts upon the assumption … Keep Reading